SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ker) 85

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Peter – Appellant
Versus
Moly – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

This is a petition filed under S.18 of the Indian Divorce Act. Husband is the petitioner. He seeks a decree declaring his marriage with the respondent as null and void. Parties belong to Roman Catholics. They got married on 29.4.1990 at Elanjipra Church as per Christian rites. Thereafter, they lived together till 10.11.1990 when the respondent's father took the respondent from the petitioner's house to her own house.

2. The ground urged in this petition is that respondent was mentally ill at the time of marriage and she continues to be so, even now and this fact was suppressed from the petitioner, and concealing this fact, consent of the petitioner was obtained for marriage. Had the mental status of the respondent been divulged, the petitioner would not have given consent for the marriage. Thus, there was fraud. Petitioner also submitted that respondent had told him that she had no menstruation at any time and even after marriage. She had Gynecological defect and she was unable to conceive, which is the primary aim of the marriage. The fact that the respondent is unable to conceive had been withheld from the petitioner before marriage and that also a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top