SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ker) 304

J.B.KOSHY
Paul – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent


Judgment :-

J.B. Koshy, J.

Petitioners filed application under S.28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the basis of Ext. P2 judgment in L.A.R. No. 180 of 1984 dated 28.3.1987. S.28A application was filed on 20.7.1992 which was received in the office on 25.7.1992. The application was filed after five years. S.28A clearly indicates that a person whose land is acquired under a common notification issued under S.4(1) of the Act but who failed to apply under S.18 is eligible to make a written application within three months from the date of award of the reference court. Only the time taken for applying for certified copy can be excluded as per proviso to S.28A. This period of limitation cannot be bye-passed by saying that petitioner came to know about the award of the reference court only later. In this connection, I refer to the decision of the Supreme Court in Tola Ram v. State of U.P. (TT 1997 (6) SC 231). It was held by the Apex Court as follows:

"The proviso to S.28A gives a right to the persons to obtain the certified copy of the award and decree and the time taken for obtaining the certified copy of the award and the decree shall be excluded in computing the period of three mont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top