SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 146

PAREED PILLAY
Santhigiri Ashram – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioners seek writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 to permit them to cast their votes in the ensuing General Elections in Kerala. First petitioner is Santhigiri Ashram and petitioners 2 to 135 are

its inmates.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that when the draft voters' list was published their names were found omitted, that they immediately filed applications in Form No.6 requesting for inclusion of their names in the voters 'list, that the first respondent issued a notice dated 23-3-1991 requiring them to appear before him on 30-3-1991 and that on account of the tension prevailing in the locality they could not do so. On knowing that their applications for inclusion of their names in the amended list were rejected by the first respondent they filed appeals before the second respondent. Petitioners contend that they could not appear before the first respondent on account of the prevailing tension and disorderly situation in the locality and as they apprehended danger to life.

3. Petitioners submitted that they may be allowed to exercise their franchise at least with some conditions imposed. Suggestion is that their ballot papers may be kept in a separate








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top