SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 119

PARIPOORNAN, BALANARAYANA MARAR
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
India Sea Foods – Respondent


Judgment :-

Paripoornan, J.

At the instance of the Revenue, and as directed by this Court in O.P. No. 4377 of 1987-S, the Incometax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following two questions of law, for the decision of this Court:

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal justified in law in holding that the defect should be treated as a technical defect and in directing the Incometax Officer to return form No. 12 to the assessee firm with a direction to submit the same after rectifying the defect within the time given by the Income-tax Officer?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal correct in law in directing the Income-tax Officer to dispose of the question of granting registration to the assessee-firm after the expiry of the time given by the Income-tax Officer for complying with the defect in form No. 12".

2. The respondent/ assessee, a firm of ten partners, was granted registration for the assessment year 1978-79. We are concerned, in this reference, with the assessment year 1979-80, for which The accounting pcriodended on 31-12-1978. For the assessment year 1979-80, the assessee filed an application s














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top