SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 33

KRISHNAMOORTHY
Ponnammal – Appellant
Versus
Gomez – Respondent


Judgment :-

Revision petitioners are judgment-debtors 12 and 14 to 20 who are the legal representatives of the 3rd judgment-debtor. The 13th judgment-debtor who was also a legal representative of the 3rd judgment-debtor released his right in favour of the decree-holder. The suit was for redemption of a mortgage. Preliminary decree was passed on 19-8-1970 and a final decree application was filed on 4-2-77. The final decree was actuary passed on 18-9-79 and the redemption price was deposited on 22-9-1971). It is also to be noted that this suit is instituted in 1968, i.e. before 1970.

2. After the final decree was passed, the decree-holder filed E.P.No. 55 of 1980 for executing the decree and for recovery of possession of the property. The 3rd judgment-debtor died during the pendency of the execution proceedings and his legal representatives, the revision petitioners. filed an objection in execution raising two contentions: i) that they are tenants entitled to fixity of tenure as the mortgage sought to be redeemed is an ottikuzhikanam coming under S.2(39A) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act (hereinafter called the act); and ii) that under Explanation IV to S.2(25) they are kudikidappukars













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top