PAREED PILLAY
Chathunni – Appellant
Versus
Visalakshy – Respondent
1. C.M.Ps. 3711 of 1990 and 3712 of 1990 are petitions filed to substitute the petitioners as the legal representatives of deceased Chathunni (original revision petitioner) in the above C.R.Ps. The other petitions are filed to set aside abatement and for condonation of delay.
2. The revision petitioner died on 1-5-1988. The petitions for substitution of the legal heirs were filed on 20-11-1990. The petitions to set aside abatement and the petitions to condone delay were filed on 2-1-1991 and 7-1-1991.
3. Petitioners contended that there is no period of limitation for substitution petition filed under S.151 C.P.C. in contra distinction to impleading petition which has to be filed within 90 day? as provided under Article 120 of the Limitation Act. Counsel submitted that C.M.Ps. 3711 of 1990 and 3712 of 1990 may also be construed as impleading" petitions and as a matter of abundant caution petitioners have filed applications to set aside abatement and delay condonation petitions.
4. Counsel relied on Munnery Khan v. Kaushilya Devi (A.I.R.1981 Allahabad 240) in support of his contention that for an application for substitution of legal representatives in the place of the decea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.