SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 61

K.T.THOMAS, P.K.SHAMSUDDIN
S. Prithviraj Kukkillaya – Appellant
Versus
Mathew Koshy – Respondent


Judgment :-

SHAMSUDDIN, J.

This Criminal Revision Petition is directed against an order passed by the Court below holding that prosecution against the 1st respondent was not maintainable in view of Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India.

2. Short facts which are necessary for determination of the question raised in the Criminal Revision Petition are as follows : Ist respondent approached the petitioner herein for a loan of Rs. 17,000/- and represented that the amount would be returned within a month. The petitioner paid the amount. Towards the discharge of debt, 1st respondent drew a cheque in favour of the petitioner on the State Bank of India, Statue Branch, Thiruvananthapuram on 2-12-1988. On 8-41989, petitioner presented the cheque for encashment. The State Bank of India dishonoured the cheque with endorsement 'refer to drawer' of the same day. Thereupon, petitioner demanded payment of the amount through a registered notice dated 13-4-1989. Ist respondent received the same on 17-4-1989. As there was no response to the notice, nor any payment, petitioner filed a complaint before the lower Court on 19-5-1989 alleging that 1st respondent committed an offence under Section 138


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top