SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 177

L.MANOHARAN, M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Manoj K. Seth – Appellant
Versus
R. J. Fernandez – Respondent


Judgment :-

MANOHARAN, J.

Petitioner seeks to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 479 of 1990 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam by invoking Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. Respondent filed a complaint against petitioner alleging that a cheque issued by the petitioner on 6-3-1990 for an amount of Rs. 15,192.65 drawn on the Syndicate Bank, Ernakulam was presented for encashment on 2-8-1990 was dishonoured on 3-8-1990, and that though notice as required under Clause (b) of proviso to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (for short 'the Act') was issued, the petitioner failed to make the payment within 15 days of the receipt of the notice, and therefore the petitioner has committed offence under Section 139 of the Act.

2. According to the petitioner, the cheque post-dated 6-3-1990 was drawn on 1-3-1986; and since the cheque was not presented within six months from the said date as required under Clause (a) of Proviso to Section 138 of the Act, no offence under the said section is disclosed and therefore it is necessary that the proceeding is quashed.

3. The learned single Judge before whom the matter came up for consideration felt that the matter



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top