SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 386

B.M.TULSIDAS, K.T.THOMAS, P.K.SHAMSUDDIN
C. Narayanan (Writer) And Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

THOMAS, J.

This is a case is which a Sub-Inspector was shot dead inside his police station. The crucial question involved here is whether he shot himself dead or was shot at by one of his subordinates in conspiracy with others in the police station. Sessions Court found that he was shot dead by one of his subordinates. One Head Constable and two Constables (out of seven persons arraigned as accused in the trial court) were convicted and sentenced for murder and also for certain other allied offences. Other accused were acquitted. The first three appeals are those preferred by the convicted accused. Union of India filed one appeal for enhancement of sentence from imprisonment for life to death penalty and another appeal against acquittal.

2. The scene of occurrence was the Sub-Inspector's room in Panur Police Station. That date of occurrence was 12-3-1981 at 11-55 a.m. The facts of this case are simple, but evidence is much. Three different agencies have handled the investigation in this case at three different stages. The first two (local police and then crime branch wing of Kerala Police) concluded that this is a case of suicide. But the Central Bureau of Investigation























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

None. There are no indications from the provided case law list that this case has been overruled, reversed, criticized, or otherwise treated as bad law. The list only states the principle established in the case without referencing subsequent judicial treatment.

[Followed/Established]

The case <01500017633> appears to be a foundational or landmark decision that establishes a legal principle regarding the jurisdiction of courts in contract cases. There is no indication that this case has been overruled or criticized, suggesting it remains good law and is likely followed or cited as authority in relevant legal contexts.

None. The treatment of this case is clear from the information provided; there are no indications of subsequent treatment that would suggest uncertainty or ambiguity.

**Source :** S. M. Kadirsa Rawther VS K. Shanmugha Mudaliar - Kerala Sharad Birdhichand Sarda VS State Of Maharashtra - Supreme Court

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top