SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 282

PARIPOORNAN, K.A.NAYAR
Paily – Appellant
Versus
Muthiah – Respondent


Judgment :-

K. A. Nayar, J.

The writ appeal is against the judgment in O.P. No. 1956 of 1990 by the workman, viz. Assistant Conductor of the second respondent who was charge sheeted and after domestic enquiry dismissed from service by the management which became subject matter of an Industrial Dispute No. 126/1986 adjudicated by the 2nd respondent, Labour Court, Ernakulam. The second respondent directed to reinstate the workman without benefit of back wages. both-the management and the workman are filed writ petitions, viz. O.P.No.1956/90 and O.P. 5762 of 1990 challenging the award - the management against the direction to reinstate "the workman and, the workman against the order denying the back wages. The learned Single Judge disposed of both the original petitions with the direction to reemploy the workman as Supervisor and not an Assistant Conductor. That means the dismissal of the original petition filed by the workman and modification of the award, in the original petition filed by the management. The workman has not filed an appeal against the order passed in his original petition, but he filed writ appeal against the judgment in O.P. filed by the management, viz. O.P. No. 19







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top