RAMAKRISHNAN
Vawakkavu Muslim Thaikkavupally – Appellant
Versus
Narayanan Purushan – Respondent
Appellants are defendants in a suit for injunction filed by the respondents in this appeal. Appellant No.1 is a Mosque and appellant Nos. 2 and 3 are its President and Secretary. Respondents land 2 are husband and wife and the 3rd respondent is the father of the second respondent and power of attorney holder of respondents 1 and 2.
2. The three questions of law formulated and on which notice has been ordered in the appeal are the following:
"(i) From the facts of this case, is not the suit bad for non joinder of the state as a party in the suit?
(ii) In the absence of a claim for easement, can a plaintiff sue for the relief of injunction without alleging at least possession over the property with respect to which plaintiff prays for injunction against the defendants?
(Hi) In a case of dispute regarding existence of a way and the use of the same by the plaintiff, can a finding be entered discarding the oral evidence in the case?
3. The brief facts necessary for deciding the questions of law formulated in the appeal are: plaint A schedule property, 121/2 cents in extent, admittedly belongs to plaintiffs 1 and 2 and it is in the possession and management of the 3rd plaintiff. P
AIR 1965 S.C. 1147; 1928 Cal. 485; 1914 All 341; (1903) 2 Ch
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.