PADMANABHAN
Kunhiraman – Appellant
Versus
Manoj – Respondent
Kunhiraman is a wealthy middle-aged eligible bachelor. Vilasini is his neighbour. She is a young spinster working as agent of an insurance company. Vilasini became pregnant and gave birth to Manoj. Pregnancy and delivery were cleverly concealed by her because she was unmarried. Delivery was in the paramba, where the child was abandoned. Matter came to the notice of the police. She was prosecuted, but acquitted. Now the child is happily living with her. In the birth register, Kunhiraman's name appeared as father on her information. He objected and got his name removed. On behalf of Manoj, she filed M.C.No.17 of 1988 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thalasserry against Kunhiraman under S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for getting maintenance. Kunhiraman denied paternity. Chief Judicial Magistrate found him to be the putative father and awarded maintenance at the monthly rate of Rs.500/-. Kunhiraman wants to revise that order.
2. Both Kunhiraman and Vilasini hail from families having good antecedents. In the petition and in the box as PW 1, vilasini said that in her life, she gave sexual access only to Kunhiraman. Kunhiraman denies having had any such access to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.