SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 169

BALANARAYANA MARAR, PARIPOORNAN
Dy. Commissioner Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Ummul Kulsu – Respondent


Judgment :-

Balanarayana Marar, J.

Common question arises in these three tax revision cases. The question is whether glass bottles and phials come under Entry 111 of the First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales-tax Act and exigible to tax at 10% of the sales turnover or only at the general rate applicable to unclassified items.

2. Respondent in T.R.C. 113/90 and T.R.C.114/90 is a dealer in aluminium goods, plastic goods, empty bottles etc. at a Corpora lion building at Kozhikode. For the years 1983-84 and 1984-85 he was assessed to sales-tax. The assessing authority levied tax on the turnover of empty bottles and phials sold by the respondent at 10% treating the same as "glass ware" coming under item 1U of the First Schedule to K.G,S.T. Act. On appeal the appellate Assistant Commissioner concurred with the assessing authority. The assessee preferred second appeal as T.A. 579 and 580 of 1988 before the Sales-tax appellate Tribunal, Additional Bench, Kozhikode. As per a common order in those appeals the Tribunal held that empty bottles and phia's are not items coming under Entry 111 of the First Schedule and that they are not glass ware. It was further held that the sales-tax turnove


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top