SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 165

BALAKRISHNAN
Veeriah – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Kunju Koya – Respondent


Judgment :-

Plaintiff in O.S.817/84 on the file of the Principal Munsiffs Court, Alleppey is the appellant in the second appeal. Plaintiff filed the suit for injunction to restrain the first defendant from executing the order of the Rent Controller passed in R.C.P. 78/77. The suit was dismissed by the trial court which was later confirmed in appeal.

2. The facts in brief are as follows. The predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff let out the plaint schedule building to the first defendant on 6-10-70 on a monthly rent of Rs. 75/- as per Ext. A3 rent deed. The tenancy was for a period of 5 months. The first defendant sublet the plaint schedule building to the 2nd defendant, who, in turn, sublet the building to the 3rd defendant. Appellant filed R.C.P. 11/84 for eviction of the tenants. Prior to this defendants 1 and 2 had filed R.C.P. 78/77 to evict the 3rd defendant from the plaint schedule building. R.C.P. 78/77 was allowed and the 3rd defendant was directed to surrender possession of the building. During the pendency of R.C.P. 11/84 that is, R.C.P. filed by the plaintiff, the 3rd defendant, who was in possession of the building surrendered possession of the same to the plaintiff o

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top