SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 96

RADHAKRISHNA MENON
Thomas Luka – Appellant
Versus
Secretary R. T. A. – Respondent


Judgment :-

The reliefs prayed for in the O.P. read:-

"(i) call for the records leading to Exts. P5 and P7 and quash the same by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ direction or order;

(ii) direct the 1st respondent to restore Ext. p4 timings; by considering Ext. P6 objections;

(iii) stay the operation of Ext. P5 timings with liberty to operate the service by the 3rd respondent on the basis of Ext. P4 timings, pending the final disposal of the original petition;

(iv) pass such other orders deemed fit in the circumstances of the case; and

(v) award the costs of the petitioner."

2. By Ext. P2 order the Secretary, R.T.A., Kottayam, granted to the 3rd respondent a temporary permit for twenty days to operate his vehicle KEK1203 on the route Kaippally-Palai via., Bharananganam, Ambaranirappel, Erattupetta and Poonjar with the timings made mention of therein. The petitioner challenged Ext. P2 before the S.T.A.T. by filing a revision, the S.T.A.T. while sustaining the grant directed the Secretary to consider the objections, the petitioner has filed, to the timings given to the 3rd respondent, and pass appropriate orders





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top