THOMAS, SHAMSUDDIN
Jose – Appellant
Versus
Thomas – Respondent
Shamsuddin, J.
These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of Rent Control Petitions filed by the respondent herein for eviction of the tenants from the respective petition scheduled premises under Ss.11(2) and 11(4) (iv) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965, which is hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for short. All the Rent Control Petitions were tried jointly and a common judgment was rendered by the Rent Control Court allowing eviction both under S.11(2) and S.11(4)(iv) of the Act. The appeals filed by the respective tenants were dismissed by the Rent Control appellate Authority confirming the orders passed by the Rent Control Court. These revision petitions have been filed by the respective tenants.
2. Both the Rent Control Court and the appellate Authority found that the tenants have committed default in payment of rent and that the building needs reconstruction and the landlord bona fide required to reconstruct the same. In view of the concurrent findings of the authorities below, the counsel for the petitioners strained very much to convince us that the findings of the courts below are not supported by any legal evidence, but we are satisfied t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.