SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 388

THOMAS, SHAMSUDDIN
Jose – Appellant
Versus
Thomas – Respondent


Judgment :-

Shamsuddin, J.

These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of Rent Control Petitions filed by the respondent herein for eviction of the tenants from the respective petition scheduled premises under Ss.11(2) and 11(4) (iv) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965, which is hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for short. All the Rent Control Petitions were tried jointly and a common judgment was rendered by the Rent Control Court allowing eviction both under S.11(2) and S.11(4)(iv) of the Act. The appeals filed by the respective tenants were dismissed by the Rent Control appellate Authority confirming the orders passed by the Rent Control Court. These revision petitions have been filed by the respective tenants.

2. Both the Rent Control Court and the appellate Authority found that the tenants have committed default in payment of rent and that the building needs reconstruction and the landlord bona fide required to reconstruct the same. In view of the concurrent findings of the authorities below, the counsel for the petitioners strained very much to convince us that the findings of the courts below are not supported by any legal evidence, but we are satisfied t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top