SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 405

GUTTAL
Sukumaran – Appellant
Versus
Radha – Respondent


Judgment :-

The District Judge, Kozhikode allowed the CM.A No. 111/90 against the order of the Munsiff, Kozhikode-II, whereby the latter had dismissed LA No. 6135/90 for injunction made by the plaintiff. The result is that while the Munsiff dismissed the application for interim 'injunction, the District Judge, in appeal, granted it. The defendants impugn the validity of the order of the learned District Judge, Kozhikode in C.M.A 111/90,

2. In suit No. 207/84 the defendants secured a decree for partition. The decree was made by the Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode. The plaintiff was not a party to O.S. No. 207/84 filed by the defendants. She therefore made LA. No. 916/84 for joining herself as a defendant. This application was dismissed by the Munsiff. She filed C.R.P. No. 1887/ 1985. But before C.R.P. No. 1887/85 could be disposed off, O.S. No. 207/84 was decreed.

Therefore, she filed the present suit No. 840/90 in the court of the Munsiff, Kozhikode. She seeks a decree for partition and perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from executing the decree in O.S. No. 207/84. As already stated, she filed LA No. 6135/90 for interim injunction restraining the defendants from prosecutin












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top