SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 265

BALAKRISHNA MENON, K.A.NAYAR, RADHAKRISHNA MENON
Lakshmanan – Appellant
Versus
Mohamood – Respondent


Judgment :-

Radhakrishna Menon, J.

The question about the validity of the Notification, SRONo.47/82 under S.25 of The Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, for short The Rent Control Act, granting exemption in respect of buildings owned by Wakfs registered under Wakfs Act, 1954 with the Kerala Wakf Board from all the provisions of the said Act, among others, arises for consideration in these Second Appeals. The validity of the Notification was upheld by our brother K.S. ParipoornanJ. as is seen from the judgment in O.P.4959/ 1984 and connected cases, relying on a decision of the Supreme Court in S. Kaddaswamy Chettiar v. State of Tamil Nadu, A.I.R. 1985 SC 257.

2. A Division Bench of this court doubted the correctness of the judgment in O.P.4959/84 and consequently referred the issue for the consideration of a Full Bench and that is how these second appeals have came up before us. For easy reference we shall now reproduce relevant portions of the reference order: -

"3. The two enactments have differing provisions on this crucial question. The condition contained in S.25 of the Kerala Act are more rigorous than those in the corresponding section of the Tamil Nadu enactme


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top