SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 301

PARIPOORNAN, THULASIDAS
Rajamma – Appellant
Versus
Leela – Respondent


Judgment :-

Thuiasidas, J.

Additional respondents 2 to 8 in R.C.A. No.59 of 1989 of the Rent Control

Appellate Authority, Koliam, are the petitioners in this revision. They are the legal representatives of one Pappu Raghavan, against whom the respondents herein filed R.C.P. No.18 of 1982 before the Rent Control Court, Koliam, for eviction under Ss.11(2),11(3) and 11(4) (ii) and (iii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 2 of 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

2, It was alleged that the petition schedule premises with the machinery and accessories for a. saw mill were leased to Raghavan by one Narayanan, grandfather of the first respondent, on a monthly rent of Rs.525/- on 14-1--1.970 for a period of two years. On 1-5-1978, the rent was enhanced to Rs.675/-. Raghavan committed default in payment of rent from 1st of May, 1979 onwards. He was also alleged to have used the saw mill and accessories in an irresponsible and negligent manner that reduced their utility materially and permanently. He had his own building and land suitable to run a saw-mill. The lessor-Narayanan and the first respondent, to whom the petition-schedule property was allotted in partition, is

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top