SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 120

BALANARAYANA MARAR
Sujir Keshav Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Sujir Ganesh Nayak – Respondent


Judgment :-

Revision arises from the finding on issues 19 and 20 in O.S.137/1983 before Sub Judge, Kollam. That is a suit for a declaration that M/s Sujit Ganesh Nayak and Co., a partnership firm of which plaintiff and defendant were the partners, stood dissolved or is deemed to have been dissolved with effect from 21st December 1982 or from 14th March 1981 as claimed by the defendant and for rendition of accounts. A permanent injunction was also sought seeking to restrain defendant from appropriating or disposing of plaint A schedule immovable properties and the movables in the B schedule as well as for a permanent injunction to restrain defendant from interlaying with the rights of the plaintiff from entering the head office of the firm situated in item No.l of the plaint A schedule and inspecting books of accounts and movables kept therein. Plaintiff claimed 7/16 shares in the assets of the firm. For the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction, the share of the plaintiff was valued at Rs.10,050 under S.36 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act and an amount of Rs.985 was paid as court fee. The relief of injunction was valued at Rs. 150 under S.27(c) and court fee of Rs.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top