SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 305

PADMANABHAN
Augustine Mathai – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Authority – Respondent


Judgment :-

Under S.18 of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, no employer shall dispense with the services of an employee employed continuously for a period of not less than six months, except for reasonable cause and without giving such employee at least one month's notice or wages in lieu of such notice. This is subject to the proviso that where services are dispensed with on a charge of misconduct supported by satisfactory evidence at an enquiry held for that purpose no such notice is necessary. An appeal lies before the Deputy Labour Commissioner (Authority) under sub section (2) in case of contravention. Petitioner claims that he was an employee under the 2nd respondent-Church for the past 27 years and his services were dispensed with in violation of S.18. He filed an appeal which was dismissed by the first respondent accepting the preliminary objection of the 2nd respondent that the Church does not come within the definition of 'establishment' under the Act. Prayer is to quash Exrt.P1 order and for a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the appeal afresh on the merits.

2. Petitioner claims that he was an accountant under the 2nd respondent and he was





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top