PADMANABHAN
Augustine Mathai – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Authority – Respondent
Under S.18 of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, no employer shall dispense with the services of an employee employed continuously for a period of not less than six months, except for reasonable cause and without giving such employee at least one month's notice or wages in lieu of such notice. This is subject to the proviso that where services are dispensed with on a charge of misconduct supported by satisfactory evidence at an enquiry held for that purpose no such notice is necessary. An appeal lies before the Deputy Labour Commissioner (Authority) under sub section (2) in case of contravention. Petitioner claims that he was an employee under the 2nd respondent-Church for the past 27 years and his services were dispensed with in violation of S.18. He filed an appeal which was dismissed by the first respondent accepting the preliminary objection of the 2nd respondent that the Church does not come within the definition of 'establishment' under the Act. Prayer is to quash Exrt.P1 order and for a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the appeal afresh on the merits.
2. Petitioner claims that he was an accountant under the 2nd respondent and he was
1971 KLT 661;1988 (2) KLT 178;1979 KLT 139; 1984 KLT 1039 & 1991 (1) KLT 89
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.