SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 78

BALANARAYANA MARAR
Kunjamma – Appellant
Versus
Bhageerathy Amma – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This second appeal arises from a final decree for redemption of a mortgage. The preliminary decree passed on 19-1-1970 directed the plaintiff-mortgagor to deposit the mortgage amount of Rs. 154.40 and an amount of Rs.200/- towards the value of improvements within a period of two months from that date or any later date upto which the payment may be extended by the court. It was further directed that on such payment the defendant-mortgagee shall deliver up all the documents in his possession and reconvey the property free from all encumbrances. Plaintiff did not deposit the amount within the prescribed time, nor did he seek extension of time to make the deposit. In the meantime he died. The 1st defendant also died since the date of decree. An application was filed by the legal representatives of deceased plaintiff on 2-2-1977 as I.A.No.388/1977 for passing a final decree after recording them as the legal representatives and permitting them to make the necessary deposit. Request was also made for recording defendants 2 to 6 as the legal representatives of deceased 1st defendant and for impleading defendants 8 to 12. During the pendency of that petition another applicati















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top