SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 232

B.M.TULSIDAS
State Superintendent, Special Customs Preventive Unit, Cannanore – Appellant
Versus
Moidu – Respondent


Judgment :-

This reference u/S. 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Tellicherry in respect of an order of committal passed by the Judicial Magistrate of the Second Class, Cannanore.

2. The above case arose on a complaint filed by the Superintendent of Special Customs Preventive Unit, Cannanore against one A. Moidu of Azhiyoor u/S. 17 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 on the allegation that he was found in unauthorised possession of 7.600 Kgs., of opium for sale on 26-1-1989 at 12-30 hrs. The accused was apprehended while travelling in bus KRZ 3804 from Bombay to Tirur.

3. I heard Shri T. V. Prabhakaran, as amicus curiae and Shri K. Prabhakaran, Senior Central Government Standing Counsel as also the Additional Public Prosecutor.

4. The Sessions Judge has stated, that the officers empowered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act to investigate into offences and prosecute the offenders are not police officers, entitled to file a report or a charge-sheet u/S. 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but should file complaint u/S. 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and since such a compl







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top