SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 31

PAREED PILLAY
Devassia Mathew – Appellant
Versus
Mathai – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. First defendant in O.S. 5 of 1981 of the District Court, Kottayam is the appellant. The first respondent-plaintiff filed O.P. 55 of 1980 under S.278 of the Indian Succession Act for the grant of Letters of Administration with the copy of the will annexed. As the petition became contentious it was converted

into a suit.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that deceased Augusthy Thommen executed Ext.Al will on 24-12-1114 M.E. in the presence of attestors, that he died on 8-1-1115 M.E., that the will was subsequently registered in 1118 M.E. and that the plaintiff should be granted Letters of Administration with the copy of the will annexed. First defendant disputed the genuineness of the will. The District Judge granted Letters of Administration in favour of the plaintiff.

3. Ext.Al will was attested by four witnesses. Except Augusthy Antony, the first witness in Ext.Al other attesting witnesses are not alive. P.W.1 stated that the witness Augusthy Antony is aged 90 years, that he is unable to walk and that his power of speech has been impaired. Twice summons were taken to the witness. On the first occasion the summons was returned stating that the witness was not residing per










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top