SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 316

KRISHNAMOORTHY
Swapna – Appellant
Versus
Thankavelu – Respondent


Judgment :-

Appeal is by the plaintiff who is the wife of the defendant. The suit was for return of the plaint a schedule ornaments and B schedule utensils or in the alternative to recover the value thereof from the defendant. The plaintiff was the wife of the defendant and they have been divorced. According to the plaintiff while they were residing together, on 25-2-1979 when she received information that her brother was seriously ill in the hospital at Coimbatore, she had to go there and before going to see her brother she had entrusted the ornaments to the custody of her husband on that day. Consequent to the illness brother died and after her return the relationship between the parties became strained and later they were divorced. The plaintiff filed the suit for return of the ornaments and other utensils or in the alternative for the price.

2. Defendant raised various contentions and contended that she had not entrusted any ornaments or utensils with him and that her brother or the wife had no capacity to purchase the articles. Accordingly he prayed for dismissal of the suit.

3. The trial court overruled all the contentions of the defendant and granted the plaintiff a decree for





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top