RAMAKRISHNAN, U.L.BHAT
Kunhunni – Appellant
Versus
Kesavan Narnboodiri – Respondent
Bhat, J.
These appeals are directed against the decree and judgment passed by the Subordinate Judge, Kasaragod in O.S.60 of 1977.
2. Plaint A schedule consists of 16 items of immovable properties, plaint B schedule
comprises two items of immovable proper ties and plaint C schedule comprises three movables, namely, a jeep, water pump set and motor cycle. Plaintiffs and defendants are admittedly members of a Namboodiri Illam, being descendants of one Keshavan Namboodiri. Second plaintiff is the wife of and plaintiffs 3 to 8 are children of first plaintiff. Seventh defendant is the wife of and defendants 3 to 5 are the children of first defendant. Ninth defendant is the wife of third defendant. Eighth defendant is the wife of and sixth defendant is the daughter of second respondent. First plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 are the children of Keshavan Namboodiri. Plaintiffs have 8/17 shares in the Illam assets, if otherwise they are entitled to a share. Plaintiffs filed the suit for partition claiming separation of their share with past profits for three years and future profits. First defendant filed a written statement and defendants 3 to 5 and 7 to 9 filed a joint written st
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.