SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 340

THOMAS
Parameswaran Nair – Appellant
Versus
R. T. O. Trissur – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioner has applied for the grant of a regular stage carriage permit on an inter-district (or inter-regional) route. As major portion of the route lies within the territorial limits of Regional Transport Authority, Trissur, the application was made before that Transport Authority. The Secretary of the Transport Authority, instead of placing the application for consideration before the Transport Authority, addressed a letter to the Secretary of the other Regional Transport Authority. Ext. P3 Is a copy of the communication which the Secretary of the Regional Transport Authority, Trissur, addressed to the petitioner in which the petitioner was informed that his "application will be placed before the R.T. A. on receipt of the concurrence". Petitioner challenges the action of the Secretary of the Regional Transport Authority, Trissur, in this Original Petition.

2. The thrust of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it was open to the Regional Transport Authority of any one region to grant a permit and it is for the permit holder to apply for counter signature by the Regional Transport Authority of the other region. He relied on S.88(1) of



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top