SUKUMARAN
Gourisankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
Those who ordinarily appear in court for others, are themselves in court now. They complain against an illegality on the part of the Government; on the part of the Law Department of the Government. A legal question is involved concerning a Central enactment. Viewed from another aspect, a larger one of constitutional perspective is also involved in view of a somewhat strange stand taken by the Government
in its counter-affidavit. The petitioners, as hinted earlier, are legal practitioners, Advocates, practicing in different courts, from one end of the State to the other. They had been appointed by the Government, as Notary Public. Most of them have been appointed under the provisions of the Notaries Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), a comprehensive legislation adopted by the Parliament in the early years of the Republic. The appointment is for a term but is renewable. The statutory requirements for the renewal were complied with by all of them. They were, however, confronted with the policy decision of the State Government. It was through a section officer of the Law Department that this policy decision was conveyed to the court by a counter-affidavit. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.