SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 313

U.L.BHAT, RAMAKRISHNAN
Sumangala T. Pai – Appellant
Versus
Sundaresa Pai – Respondent


Judgment :-

Bhat,J.

Plaintiff in a suit for partition is the appellant herein.

2. First defendant is the husband, plaintiff and fifth defendant are the daughters and defendants 2 to 4 are the sons of Indira Bai who died on 13-11-1981. First defendant died when the suit was pending in the trial court. Plaintiff filed the suit for partition of the moveable and immoveable properties belonging to Indira Bai and separation of her 1/6th share therein on the ground that Indira Bai died intestate. The suit was resisted by registered notice Ext.A8 demanding share. In the reply notice defendants set up a contention that Indira Bai had executed Ext.Bl unregistered Will dated 26-8-1981. According to the plaint, Will is not true and genuine and has been forged and fabricated with the sole object of defeating the claims of the plaintiff. After the death of the first defendant plaint was amended to state that plaintiff is entitled to fractional share in the share of the first defendant. Defendants 1 and 5 filed joint written statement. Defendants 2 to 4 also filed joint written statement. All the defendants set up Ext.Bl Will in answer to the plaintiffs claim. The trial court upheld Ext.Bl Will and
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top