SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 388

JOHN MATHEW
Ameeruddhin Ahammed – Appellant
Versus
Mehurunesa Begum – Respondent


Judgment :-

The main point to be decided is whether the court which appointed a guardian under the Guardians and Wards Act (hereinafter referred to as the act) has the jurisdiction to scrutinise the accounts filed by the guardian and to direct him to pay the balance amount as determined by the court.

2. In respect of the properties of the 1st respondent in CRP. 1920 of 1986, who is the revision petitioner in CRP. 2266 of 1986, (who is hereinafter referred to as the ex-minor) the District Court, Thodupuzha appointed her mother as her guardian in a guardians and wards petition. 4.65 acres of cardamom land belonging to the minor was in the possession of one A.M.A. Sultan as the power of attorney holder of the guardian. He assumed possession and management of the property from 19-10-1972 onwards. The minor attained 21 years of age on 10-2-1978. She filed I.A.155 of 1979 for a direction to hand over possession of the property along with the profits collected by the power of attorney holder. Before the lower court the above said A.M.A. Sultan filed a counter affidavit contending that he had put the property in the possession of his son, who is the 1st revision petitioner in C.R.P. 1920 of












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top