SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 412

VARGHESE KALLIATH
Scariah Varghese – Appellant
Versus
Marykutty – Respondent


Judgment :-

This is an appeal by the defendant. Defendant is the husband of the 1st plaintiff. The 2nd plaintiff is the minor child of the 1st plaintiff and the defendant.

2. Suit was one for return of the streedhanam amount paid to the defendant by the parents of the 1st plaintiff. According to the 1st plaintiff, on the date of betrothal, the father of the 1st plaintiff promised an amount of Rs.22,000/- and 16 sovereigns of gold ornaments as streedhanam for his daughter, the 1st plaintiff and the father agreed to pay Rs. 12,000/- on the date of betrothal and the balance Rs.10,000/.- within one year after the marriage. It was also agreed that the gold sovereigns will be given at the time of marriage. The marriage took place on 13-11-1977.

3. The further case of the 1st plaintiff is that as promised, Rs.12,000/- was given on the betrothal day by the father and the gold sovereigns were given on the date of marriage. The balance amount of Rs.10,000/- was paid on two occasions; on 30-3-1978 an amount of Rs.5,000/- and on 10-1-1979 the balance amount of Rs.5,000/-. The husband and wife, were living together for some time and the 2nd defendant was born in that wedlock. But quarrels and bic

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top