SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 20

SREEDHARAN
JOY MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
SUPDT. OF POLICE – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. When C.M.P. 33615/88 came up for orders, counsel appearing on either side wanted the original petition itself to be disposed of. Accordingly, after hearing them in detail, I am disposing of the original petition itself.

2. Petitioner is having a factory engaged in the manufacture of cement hollow bricks. That factory started functioning on 11-11-1988. Petitioner has 7 workers in the establishment. Of them, M/s. K. C. Ayyappan and K.T. Thankappan are engaged for loading and unloading work. Raw materials like cement, sand and metal are brought to the establishment in lorries. They are unloaded by the above mentioned workers. Finished articles namely, cement hollow bricks are loaded in the vehicles by those employees.

Functioning of the factory proceeded smoothly till 2-12-1988. At about 9 a.m. on that day 4 persons came to the petitioner's establishment stating that they are the loading and unloading workers in the area, that they are to attend to the loading and unloading work in the petitioner's establishment and that they will not allow the petitioner's employees to do the said work. At about 11 a.m. on that day a lorry came to the gate of the establishment to load ce













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top