SREEDHARAN
JOY MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
SUPDT. OF POLICE – Respondent
1. When C.M.P. 33615/88 came up for orders, counsel appearing on either side wanted the original petition itself to be disposed of. Accordingly, after hearing them in detail, I am disposing of the original petition itself.
2. Petitioner is having a factory engaged in the manufacture of cement hollow bricks. That factory started functioning on 11-11-1988. Petitioner has 7 workers in the establishment. Of them, M/s. K. C. Ayyappan and K.T. Thankappan are engaged for loading and unloading work. Raw materials like cement, sand and metal are brought to the establishment in lorries. They are unloaded by the above mentioned workers. Finished articles namely, cement hollow bricks are loaded in the vehicles by those employees.
Functioning of the factory proceeded smoothly till 2-12-1988. At about 9 a.m. on that day 4 persons came to the petitioner's establishment stating that they are the loading and unloading workers in the area, that they are to attend to the loading and unloading work in the petitioner's establishment and that they will not allow the petitioner's employees to do the said work. At about 11 a.m. on that day a lorry came to the gate of the establishment to load ce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.