Judges : K.G.BALAKRISHNAN,U.L.BHAT
Thankappan Mohanan And Others - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : Criminal Appeal Nos. 163 of 1986 and 166 of 1986
Decided On : 11/09/1989
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellant: M.N. Sukumaran Nayar, B. Raman Pillai and S. Vijayakumar, Sunny Varghese, Advocates. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor, C. Raghavan.
EVIDENCE - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code - S. 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 302 I.P.C. - The court convicted the accused under S. 143, 147, 148 and 341 read with S. 149 I.P.C. and S. 302 read with S. 149 I.P.C. For the offence under S. 302 I.P.C. they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. No separate sentence was awarded under the other counts. Second accused was further convicted under S. 323 I.P.C. - The judgment discusses the manner in which case diary contradictions have been brought on record and proved, and the court's observations on the procedure to be adopted in following S. 145 of the Evidence Act, with particular reference to case diary statements. The court also discusses the evidence, medical reports, and the applicability of Section 34, I.P.C. in reaching its decision.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased sustained fatal injuries and succumbed to the injuries on the way to the hospital. The prosecution case was based on eye witness testimony, evidence regarding motive, and medical evidence. The accused denied their complicity in the occurrence and claimed that the case was false and politically motivated.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the prosecution's evidence, including the eye witness testimony, to be consistent and credible. The medical evidence supported the prosecution's version of the occurrence. The court also discussed the manner in which case diary contradictions were brought on record and proved. The court found that the accused 1, 3, 4, and 5 had the common intention to cause the death of the deceased and convicted them under S. 302 read with S. 34 I.P.C. The court acquitted accused 6 to 8 of all charges and convicted the second accused under S. 323 I.P.C.
Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the prosecution's evidence, the applicability of Section 34, I.P.C., and the manner in which case diary contradictions were brought on record and proved.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution's evidence, including the eye witness testimony and medical reports, was consistent and credible. The court also discussed the procedure to be adopted in following S. 145 of the Evidence Act, with particular reference to case diary statements. The court found that accused 1, 3, 4, and 5 had the common intention to cause the death of the deceased and convicted them under S. 302 read with S. 34 I.P.C.
Final Decision: The court set aside the conviction and sentence entered against accused 6 to 8 under Sections 143, 147, 148 and 341 read with S. 149 I.P.C. and 302 read with S. 149, I.P.C. The court acquitted them of all the charges. The court also set aside the conviction and sentence entered against the second accused for the aforesaid offences and instead convicted him under S. 323 I.P.C. The court confirmed the conviction and sentence of the fourth accused under S. 302 I.P.C. The conviction and sentence of accused 1, 3 and 5 under S. 302 read with S. 149 I.P.C. were altered to one under S. 302 read with S. 34 I.P.C.
BHAT, J.
At about 7 p.m. on 4-12-1983, now deceased George, husband of P.W. 1 sustained fatal injuries and succumbed to the injuries on the way to General Hospital, Thiruvalla. At 11 p.m. P.W. 1 went to the Thiruvalla police station and gave information on the basis of which case was registered against eight persons under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323 and 302 I.P.C. read with S. 149 I.P.C. Ultimately P.W. 23 Circle Inspector of Police. Thiruvalla laid charge against these eight persons for the aforesaid offences. The trial court convicted them under S. 143, 147, 148 and 341 read with S. 149 I.P.C. and S. 302 read with S. 149 I.P.C. For the offence under S. 302 I.P.C. they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. No separate sentence was awarded under the other counts. Second accused was further convicted under S. 323 I.P.C. Accused have filed the above appeals challenging the conviction and sentence entered against them.
2. Prosecution case can be summarised as follows : George had an affair with P.W. 7, wife of the third accused on account of which he incurred enmity of the third accused. Accused are mutually related to each other. P.W. 1 is a vegetable vendor and George a fish vendor, both conducting, their business in the Koottoor market. On the evening of 4-12-1983 P.W. 1 was doing business in the market. At about 7 p.m. George rushed to her and asked her to collect vegetables in the basket and suggested that they should leave the place since accused persons were coming there and he did not know why they were doing so. P.W. 1 began to collect vegetables. By that time the eight accused reached the scene. First accused was armed with M.O. 5 sword stick. Third accused was armed with M.O. 8 iron rod. Fourth accused was armed with M.O. 6 dagger. Fifth accused was armed with M.O. 9 spring stick. Other accused were not armed. Third accused beat George above the left eye brow with M.O. 8. First accused hit him with sword stick on his chest, right elbow and left hip. Second accused snatched a tapioca stump which was being used be P.W. 1 for hanging the balance and beat George on his left shoulder and the stump broke into M.O. 7 series. Second accused beat P.W. 1 on her neck with his hand. Fourth accused stabbed George with M.O. 6 dagger on his back left finger. Fifth accused beat him on the back of his head. Accused 6 to 8 pushed George down and dragged him to and from the ground. When people rushed to the scene accused left with their weapons. P.W. 1 helped George to stand up and he took a few steps and fell down. P.Ws. 1, 6 and others took George to General Hospital, Thiruvalla in a car driven P.W. 9. P.W. 13 Civil Surgeon attached to the hospital examined George at 7.30 p.m. and found him dead. At 11 p.m. P.W. 1 went to Thiruvalla police station and gave Ext. P1 information on the basis of which P.W. 22. A.S.I. registered the case. The next day P.W. 23 took over investigation. He held inquest over the body and questioned witnesses Post-mortem was conducted by P.W. 14. P.W. 23 prepared scene mahazar and seized M.O. 7 tapioca stump. He arrested accused 2, 5, 6 and 8 on 27-12-1983 and on the information given by them he recovered M.O. 9 as per Ext. P8 mahazar attested by P.W. 16. He arrested accused 3 and 7 on 7-1-1984 and on the information given by the third accused he seized M.O. 8 under Ext. P9 mahazar attested by P.W. 7. He arrested accused 1 and 4 on 22-1-1984. On the basis of the information given by the first accused he recovered M.O. 5 under Ex. P10 mahazar attested by P.W. 18. On the basis of the information given by the fourth accused he recovered M.O. 6 dagger under Ext. P11 mahazar attested by P.W. 18. Material objects were caused to be sent and plan of the scene, was got prepared. He laid the charge after completing investigation.
3. Accused told the Sessions Court that they originally belonged Marxist Communist Party but left the party and formed a new group and therefore the local marxists ente
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.