SANKARAN NAIR
DOMINIC – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
1. These petitions arise from similar facts, and are accordingly disposed of by a common order.
2. Petitioner in Crl. R. P. 687/86 is the accused in C. C. 1524/83. while petitioner in Crl. R. P. 688/86 is the accused in C. C. 1525/83 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of Second Class, Ernakulam. Both were charged under S.55 (a) of the Abkari Act. Petitioner in Crl. R. P, 687/86 was found in jeep bearing registration No. K.R.K. 3290 at or about 7.15 a. m. on 5-9-1983 by pws. 2 & 3 Excise Officials. They searched the jeep and recovered 93.26 kgs. of ganja under Ext. P1 mahazar, attested by pw.1 who turned hostile. A sample was sent for chemical analysis, and by Ext. C1 it was reported to be 'ganja'. On the evidence of pws. 2 & 3 and on the basis of Ext. C 1, petitioner was found guilty by Courts below.
3. Petitioner in Crl.R.P. 688/86 was also found in jeep bearing registration No. K.L.O.9734 in front of the Sea Face Tourist Home, Ernakulam (where petitioner in Crl. R. P. 687/86 was also found) at or about 7.15 a.m. on 5-9-1983 by pws. 2 and 3. They recovered 89 kgs. of 'ganja' from the jeep under Ext. P1 mahazar attested by pw. J, who eventually turned hostile. On the evid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.