SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 21

BALAKRISHNAN
IBRAYI – Appellant
Versus
POKKAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The appellant is the decree-holder in O.S. No. 193 of 1972 of Munsiff's Court. Nadapuram. The 3rd respondent herein is the judgment-debtor. The appellant paid Rs. 2,250/- to the 3rd respondent towards purchase money on an agreement to buy one item of property belonging to the 3rd respondent. As the property was not said by the 3rd respondent to the appellant, suit was filed for the return of the amount. The suit was initially dismissed by the trial court. The decree was set aside by the appellate court and the judgment-debtor was directed to pay Rs. 2,250/- to the appellant. Execution was levied and the property belonging to the judgment-debtor was brought up for sale. Meanwhile respondents I and 2 filed claim petitions contending that they are bona fide purchasers of the property. According to them, this property was sold by the 3rd respondent to some third party on 15-10-1973 and from them the respondents 1 and 2 purchased the same. The claimants pleaded that they are bona fide purchasers and hence the property is not liable to be proceeded with in execution. The courts below accepted this contention and allowed the claim petition.

2. The learned counsel for the app





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top