BALAKRISHNAN
IBRAYI – Appellant
Versus
POKKAN – Respondent
1. The appellant is the decree-holder in O.S. No. 193 of 1972 of Munsiff's Court. Nadapuram. The 3rd respondent herein is the judgment-debtor. The appellant paid Rs. 2,250/- to the 3rd respondent towards purchase money on an agreement to buy one item of property belonging to the 3rd respondent. As the property was not said by the 3rd respondent to the appellant, suit was filed for the return of the amount. The suit was initially dismissed by the trial court. The decree was set aside by the appellate court and the judgment-debtor was directed to pay Rs. 2,250/- to the appellant. Execution was levied and the property belonging to the judgment-debtor was brought up for sale. Meanwhile respondents I and 2 filed claim petitions contending that they are bona fide purchasers of the property. According to them, this property was sold by the 3rd respondent to some third party on 15-10-1973 and from them the respondents 1 and 2 purchased the same. The claimants pleaded that they are bona fide purchasers and hence the property is not liable to be proceeded with in execution. The courts below accepted this contention and allowed the claim petition.
2. The learned counsel for the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.