SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 96

BALAKRISHNA MENON, KRISHNAMOORTHY
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Appellant
Versus
PURUSHOTHAMAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. In this appeal filed by the Travancore Devaswom Board under S.30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 a substantial question of law as to the liability of the Board under the above Act arises for consideration. The appeal arises out of an application for a compensation of Rs. 10,000/- on account of a fatal accident resulting in the death of one Mahendran who was the son of the applicant. The applicant alleged that his son Mahendran was engaged by the 1st and 2nd opposite parties before the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner for conducting 'Nerchavedi' in the Achencoil Temple under the management and administration of the Devaswom Board. While doing the work on 21-1-1981 the 'vedikutti' exploded as a consequence of which Mahendran died. The 1st opposite party died during the pendency of the application and opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 were impleaded as his legal representatives. The Devaswom Board was impleaded as the 5th opposite party, alleging that they are the principal employers and that the 1st opposite party was a contractor under the Board. The applicant further alleged that be is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 10,000/- from the opposite parties as co




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top