SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 177

U.L.BHAT, KRISHNAMOORTHY
Krishna Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Jalal Ahamed – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Petitioner herein is the appellant in the above appeal. He was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 1-12-1985. He filed claim petition before the Tribunal claiming Rs.1 lakh as compensation on the allegation that the motor vehicle was driven in a rash and negligent manner and such driving was responsible for the accident. The Tribunal held against the claimant and accordingly dismissed the claim petition. Dismissal is challenged in the appeal.

2. Petitioner has filed this C.M.P. contending that in any event under S.92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act he was entitled to be awarded a sum of Rs.7,500/- (on account of permanent disablement) and the Tribunal was in serious error. He therefore prays that this court may award it. The application is strenuously opposed by the third respondent-insurer, who has filed a counter. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that no amount could be directed to be paid by the insurer under S.92-A because the claimant did not file a formal application in that behalf. According to the learned counsel, Tribunal could not exercise the power suo motu. He also contends that permanent disability has not been proved.

3. There can be no dispute t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top