SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 275

VARGHESE KALLIATH
Lakshmikutty – Appellant
Versus
Mohandas – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This revision arises under the Indian Lunacy Act. Indira Devi - the daughter of the revision petitioner is said to be a lunatic. Respondents herein filed an application invoking the power of the court under S.62 of the Indian Lunacy Act, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for directing an inquisition for the purpose of ascertaining whether Indira Devi is of unsound mind and incapable of managing herself and her affairs.

2. Respondents-petitioners before the lower court claimed that they are consanguine brothers of the alleged lunatic. They further claimed that the mother of the lunatic is not taking proper care of the lunatic and her properties and that her interest is adverse to the alleged lunatic. Besides they say that certain properties belonging to the lunatic are being sold away to the second respondent in the petition before the lower court. In these circumstances, the respondents wanted the court to appoint the respondents, or one of the respondents or, a proper person, for the custody of the said lunatic for her better maintenance and protection of her properties.

3. Admittedly, Indira Devi is the daughter of deceased Murukan. Petitioners (here the responde




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top