SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 260

U.L.BHAT, KRISHNAMOORTHY
Mathew Alexander – Appellant
Versus
Sreedharan Pillai – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This appeal is by the petitioner in an application under S.110A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The application was for compensation for the personal injuries which he sustained on 13-1-1975. On that day he was travelling in a scooter from Thiruvalla to Chingavanam. While so a car belonging to the 2nd respondent and driven by the 1st respondent came from the opposite direction and knocked him down. He sustained serious injuries on his legs and consequently his right leg had to be amputated. He alleged that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the 1st respondent. The petitioner was aged 35. He was a businessman. He claimed an amount of Rs.965/- towards special damages and an amount of Rs.20,000/- towards general damages, thus claiming a total amount of Rs.20,965/- as compensation for the personal injuries sustained by him. The 2nd respondent being the owner of the vehicle was sought to be made vicariously liable and the insurer of the car was impleaded as the 3rd respondent.

2. Respondents 1 and 2 filed a written statement denying rashness or negligence on the part of the 1st respondent and contending that the amputation of the right leg was not th




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top