SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 160

VISWANATHA.IYER
Jose – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

An advocate as defined in S.2(1) (a) of the Advocates Act 25 of 1961 (the Act), has to conform to regulations in the matter of robes. S.34 of the Act enables the High Court to make rules laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate shall be permitted to practise in the High Court and in the courts subordinate thereto. Power is also conferred by S.49(1)(gg) on the Bar Council of India to make rules prescribing the form of dresses or robes to be worn by an advocate appearing before any court, or tribunal.

2. The High Court of Kerala has, in exercise of the powers vested in it under S.34, framed rules dated July 10,1969 laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate shall be permitted to practise in the High Court of Kerala, and in the courts subordinate thereto. Rule 12of these rules prescribes the dress to be worn by an advocate, and runs as under:

"12. Advocates appearing in Court shall wear the following dress. (1) Advocates other than lady advocates:-

(a) Black buttoned-up coat (chapkan, achkan or sherwani), Barrister's or Bachelor of Laws' gown, and bands, or

(b) Black open collar coat, white shirt, white collar, stiff or soft, with Barrister's or Ba




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top