Judges : MALIMATH,BHASKARAN NAMBIAR
Balakrishnan - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : O.P. No. 4706 of 1983, 3694 of 1981,1925 of 1984
Decided On : 11/01/1989
Advocates Appeared :
B. Raghunathan; For Petitioners N. Sugathan; For Respondents
Graduates - Promotion to Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) - Kerala Engineering Service (Radio and Electrical branches ) Rules - Rule 2, Rule 3 - The court upheld the prescription of a ratio of 1:1 between graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) based on the requirements of service and technical skill necessary for discharging the duties and responsibilities of the higher post. The court relied on previous Supreme Court judgments to establish that the prescription of the ratio was justified by relevant considerations and had a just relation to the object sought to be achieved.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitions challenged the prescription of the ratio of 1:1 between graduates and non-graduates Assistant Engineers for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) under the Kerala Engineering Service (Radio and Electrical branches ) Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prescription of the ratio of 1:1 between graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) was justified based on the requirements of service and technical skill necessary for discharging the duties and responsibilities of the higher post.
Issues: The principal contention was whether the prescription of the ratio of 1:1 between graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous Supreme Court judgments to establish that the prescription of the ratio was justified by relevant considerations and had a just relation to the object sought to be achieved.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the prescription of the ratio of 1:1 between graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) based on the requirements of service and technical skill necessary for discharging the duties and responsibilities of the higher post.
Malimath, CJ.
These three writ petitions are by the Assistant Engineers in the Radio branch of the Public Works Department, who have challenged the prescription of the ratio of 1:1 between graduates and non-graduates Assistant Engineers prescribed by the proviso to rule 2 of the Kerala Engineering Service (Radio and Electrical branches ) Rules, hereinafter referred to as the Rules, for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio). Rule 2 of the Rules which prescribes the method of appointment to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) reads as follows:
"2. appointment.--(a) Appointment to the categories specified in column (2) of the Table below shall be by the method specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) thereof.
2. Assistant Executive Engineer (Radio)
1. Recruitment by transfer from category of Assistant Engineer (Radio) of the Kerala Engineering Subordinate Service (Radio branch)
2. In the absence of suitable candidates for appointment by transfer by direct recruitment.
(b) Promotion and appointment by transfer shall be made from select lists of eligible officers prepared on the basis of merit and ability, seniority being considered only where merit and ability are approximately equal. Persons included in a select list shall be ranked in the order of their seniority.
Provided that a ratio of 1:1 shall be followed between graduates and non-graduates for appointment to the post by transfer, without stipulation of cadre strength."
Qualifications for the post of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) are prescribed by rule 3 of the Rules, which read as follows:
"2. Assistant Executive 1. For Recruitment by transfer:
Engineer (Radio)
Must have rendered service as Assistant Engineer in the Radio Branch on duty for a period of not less than,
(a) Five years in case he is a Degree- holder.
(b) Ten years in case he is a Diploma-holder; and
(c) Fifteen years in case he is a Certificate-holder."
It is clear from the above Rule that Degree-holders with five years' service, Diploma-holders with ten years' service and Certificate-holders with 15 years 'service in the cadre of Assistant Engineers (Radio) are treated as eligible for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio). Appointment by transfer to the said category is required to be made from a select list of eligible officers prepared on the basis of merit and ability. The proviso to rule 2 of the Rules was added by Notification dated 2-8-1983 with retrospective effect from 13-5-1981 by which a ratio of 1:1 is prescribed for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) between Graduates on the one hand and the non-graduates on the other. It is this prescription of the ratio of 1:1 between Graduates and non-graduates that is challenged by the petitioners on the ground that it is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. Though in one writ petition the prescription of different number of years of service for Degree-holders, Diploma-holders and Certificate-holders is also challenged, no arguments in that behalf were advanced during the course of hearing of these cases, obviously for the reason that the contention in that behalf stands concluded by the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Roop Chand v. Delhi Development Authority (AI.R.1989 S.C.307 ).
2. The principal contention of the petitioners is that Graduates and non-graduates having come to the common cadre of Assistant Engineers (Radio) and thus having merged into a single category, it is not constitutionally permissible to treat them differently in the matter of promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Radio) by prescribing a ratio of 1:1, between Graduates and non-graduates. In other words, the Rules regard Graduates with five years' experience on the one hand and Diploma-holders with ten years 'experience and Certificate-holders with fifteen years' experience as equally eligible for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Exe
1989 (2) KLT 3; A.I.R.1989 S.C.1624; 1974 S.C.1 & 1989 S.C.307
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.