SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ker) 381

SUKUMARAN
Kunjamma Rajamma – Appellant
Versus
Special Dy. Tahsildar – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The writ petition involves an interpretation of S.29-A of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act.

2. In the course of the acquisition proceedings relating to the land of the petitioner, an award was passed on 20-8-81. No steps were taken to challenge the award. It became final. The Land Acquisition Act was amended by the Amendment Act 68 of 1984, which came into force on 24-9-1984. It would appear that there were further proceedings for enhanced compensation in respect of some other lands acquired under the same notification. Enhanced compensation had been awarded by this Court. The petitioner then thought that she too could claim and get additional compensation at the higher rates awarded by the Court in similar cases, invoking S.28-A of the Act which found its way to the statute book by virtue of the Amendment Act. Accordingly, she filed an application dated 8-3-88 before the Land Acquisition Officer for redetermination of the compensation. The Land Acquisition Officer held that the benefits of the amended provisions were not available to the petitioner, as the award had been passed about three years prior to the Amendment Act. According to her, the section had application






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top