SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 86

U.L.BHAT, BALAKRISHNAN
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Appellant
Versus
SHARMA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The first respondent herein obtained a money decree against the second respondent in O. S.390 of 1981 of the Sub Court, Trivandrum on the basis of a compromise. At the instance of the decree-holder attachment before judgment was effected of certain sum of money said to be belonging to the judgment-debtor in the hands of the appellant herein. Executive Engineer of the K. S. E. Board. The decree-holder subsequently filed execution petition under Order XXI R.46A CPC. He filed E. A. 566/84 seeking direction to the appellant to remit the amount in court. The application was opposed by the appellant, but was allowed by the executing court. Hence this appeal.

2. In the court below appellant contended, inter alia, that the amount in his hands is the security amount deposited by the judgment-debtor, that the judgment-debtor abandoned contract and thereby the Board sustained huge loss, final liability has not been fixed and on a proper computation the Board would owe no money to the judgment-debtor and on the other baud substantial amount would be due to the Board from the judgment-debtor. The court below held that these contentions were not available to the appellant. The cour


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top