SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 366

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, P.C.BALAKRISHNA MENON
Kunju – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

BALAKRISHNA MENON, J.

The petitioners in these cases invoked S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings in C.C. Nos. 20/1988, 123/1987 and 10/1988 respectively on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Adimali. The Magistrate has taken cognizance of an offence punishable under S. 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Central Act 61 of 1985) (hereinafter referred to as Act) against each of these petitioners on the basis of the final report submitted by the police after investigation.

2. The charge-sheets submitted by the Investigating Officer in CC Nos. 20/1988 and 10/1988 show that the respective accused had in contravention of the provisions of the Act cultivated cannabis plant, thereby committing an offence punishable under S. 20 of the Act. The charge sheet in C.C. No. 123/1987 discloses also an offence under S. 55(c) of the Abkari Act (Act 1 of 1077).

3. These cases have been referred for decision by a Division Bench, as Sreedharan, J. doubted the correctness of the decision of a learned single Judge of this court in Crl.M.C. No. 944 of 1987. The learned single Judge had in the said case quashed the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top