SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 158

MALIMATH, BHASKARAN NAMBIAR
GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This case has come before the Division Bench on a reference made by Justice Thomas on the ground that important questions of law have arisen for consideration in this case which merit being decided by the Division Bench. The relevant facts necessary for the purpose of disposal of this case may be stated as follows:

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Clerk by Ext. P1 dated 7-7-1976 by the 3rd respondent-Manager of B. H. School, Kalady, a school which receives aid from the Government under the Kerala Education Act and Kerala Education Rules. The appointment was for the period from 7-7-1976 to 2-11-1976, which was duly approved by the District Educational Officer. Thereafter another vacancy to the post of Clerk arose in the year 1981 in which the petitioner was appointed as per Ext. P2 dated 21-10-1981 for the period from 21-10-1981 to 2-1-1982. That appointment was also approved by the District Educational Officer. Subsequently in the same school there occurred a vacancy of Peon in June, 1984. The 3rd respondent appointed the petitioner as a peon in that vacancy by Ext. P3 dated 25-6-1984. The District Educational Officer refused to approve the said appointment by his






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top