SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 229

THOMAS
KUNHIMOIDEENKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The appeals arise from two criminal cases tried by the Special Court (for trial of offences under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955), Trichur for the offence of contravention of Clause.16 of the Kerala Kerosene Control Order, 1968 (for short 'the order'). The aforesaid clause contains a prohibition that no person (other than an oil company or a dealer licensed under the order) shall have in his possession kerosene exceeding one tin (18.5 litres). Contravention of the said clause is an offence punishable under S.7 (1) of the Essential Commodities Act (for short'the Act'). The trial court found the accused in each case guilty of the offence and convicted him and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment and also to pay fine. These are separate appeals filed by each of them. The common point raised by the learned counsel, if accepted, will affect the results of both the appeals. Hence it is convenient to dispose of these two appeals by a common judgment.

2. The Taluk Supply Officer (T.S.O.), Hosdurg detected two hundred litres of kerosene on 10-4-1984 in a shop room which is said to be in the possession of the accused in the first case. The kerosene was found kept in a b









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top