SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 252

Judges : SREEDHARAN
ALI - Appellant
Versus
SUFAIRA - Respondent
Case No : Crl.R.P. No. 222 of 1987, 90 of 1988 etc
Decided On : 07/01/1988
Advocates Appeared :
For Petitioners For Respondents M. Retna Singh, T.G. Rajendran, Pirappancode V. Sreedharan Nair, K Bhaskaran Nair, Thomas Antony, P.C. Mohsln & P.K. Musa M.A. Manhu & V.N. Achutha Kurup

A divorced Muslim woman is entitled to both maintenance for the period of iddat and a reasonable and fair provision for her future, and the former husband is obligated to provide for the future of the divorced woman.

Headnote:

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act - Extent of liability of Muslim husband at the time of divorce - S.3(1) of the Act - Interpretation of 'provision' and 'maintenance' - Legislative intent to protect the rights of divorced Muslim women - Obligation of former husband to provide for the future of the divorced woman - Quranic principles on maintenance and provision for divorced women

Fact of the Case:

Former husbands challenge orders directing them to pay maintenance and fair compensation to divorced women under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The main issue is the extent of liability of a Muslim husband at the time of divorce.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled not only to maintenance for the period of iddat but also to a reasonable and fair provision for her future. The court set aside one order and remanded another for fresh disposal.

Issues: Interpretation of 'provision' and 'maintenance' under S.3(1) of the Act, extent of liability of former husband at the time of divorce, and the power of the Magistrate to order more than maintenance for the period of iddat.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the legislative intent to protect the rights of divorced Muslim women and the obligation of the former husband to provide for the future of the divorced woman. The court also considered Quranic principles on maintenance and provision for divorced women.

Final Decision: Criminal Revision Petitions 222/87 and 197/88 were dismissed, and the order challenged in Petitions 90/88 and 150/88 was set aside and remanded for fresh disposal.

Judgment :-

1. These Criminal Revision Petitions arise out of proceedings initiated under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as the 'the Act'. Crl. R. P. 222/87 is filed by a former husband challenging the order directing him to pay maintenance during the period of iddat and a further sum as reasonable and fair compensation to the divorced lady. Crl. R.P.Nos. 90/88 and 150/88 arise out of one and the same proceeding. The divorced woman filed a petition before the learned Magistrate u/s 3 of the Act claiming a sum of Rs. 3,00,00/- towards reasonable and fair provision for her life. Rs. 22,500/- towards maintenance for the period of iddat, Rs. 11,500/- towards the cost of five sovereigns due to her as mahr and for the return of properties mentioned in the schedule which were taken by the former husband or to pay its value amounting to Rs. 15,00,000/-. The learned Magistrate directed the former husband to pay Rs. 22,500/- by way of "reasonable and fair provision and maintenance" to be paid u/s 3 (1)(a) of the Act and Rs. 451/-by way of mahr. The divorced lady challenges that order in R.P. 90/88 while the former husband has preferred Crl.R.P.150/1988. Crl. R.P. 197/88 is at the instance of another former husband. He challenges the order passed by the learned Magistrate directing him to pay a sum of Rs. 1500/-as maintenance for the period of three months for observing iddat and Rs. 2,500/- as fair and reasonable compensation, both u/s 3(1)(a) of the Act, a sum of Rs. 3,600/-for the maintenance of the child for two years u/s 3 (1) (b) of the Act, Rs. 1500/- as mahr u/s. 3 (1)(c) and a sum of Rs. 3000/- u/s. 3 (1)(d) of the Act. These Criminal Revision Petitions, though arise out of three different proceedings, are dealt with in this common order because same questions arise for consideration. The most important aspect that arises for consideration is regarding the extent of the liability cast on a muslim husband at the time of divorce.

2. In Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum & Others (1985 (2) SCC 556) the main argument raised on behalf of the ex-husband was whether the payment of maintenance upto the period of iddat plus payment of mahr contracted for, would conclude all responsibilities of the husband under the personal law which is referred to in S.127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court then went into the question whether the muslim personal law imposes no obligation upon the husband to provide for the maintenance of his divorced wife. The court took the view that the statements contained in the textbooks on Muslim Personal Law are inadequate to establish the proposition that the muslim husband is not under an obligation to provide for the maintenance of his divorced wife who is unable to maintain herself. Consequent on the said decision there arose a situation which necessitated the passing of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. S.3(1) of the Act enumerated the various rights to which a muslim woman is entitled to at the time of divorce. It reads:

"3. Mahr or other properties of Muslim woman to be given to her at the time of divorce (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a divorced woman shall be entitled to

(a) a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and paid to her within the iddat period by her former husband;

(b) where she herself maintains the children born to her before or after her divorce, a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and paid by her former husband for a period of two years from the respective dates of birth of such children;

(c) an amount equal to the sum of mahr or dower agreed to be paid to her at the time of her marriage or at any time there-after according to Muslim Law; and

(d) all the properties given to her before or at the time of marriage or after her marriage by her relatives or friends or the husband or any relatives of the husband or































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top