SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 252

SREEDHARAN
ALI – Appellant
Versus
SUFAIRA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. These Criminal Revision Petitions arise out of proceedings initiated under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as the 'the Act'. Crl. R. P. 222/87 is filed by a former husband challenging the order directing him to pay maintenance during the period of iddat and a further sum as reasonable and fair compensation to the divorced lady. Crl. R.P.Nos. 90/88 and 150/88 arise out of one and the same proceeding. The divorced woman filed a petition before the learned Magistrate u/s 3 of the Act claiming a sum of Rs. 3,00,00/- towards reasonable and fair provision for her life. Rs. 22,500/- towards maintenance for the period of iddat, Rs. 11,500/- towards the cost of five sovereigns due to her as mahr and for the return of properties mentioned in the schedule which were taken by the former husband or to pay its value amounting to Rs. 15,00,000/-. The learned Magistrate directed the former husband to pay Rs. 22,500/- by way of "reasonable and fair provision and maintenance" to be paid u/s 3 (1)(a) of the Act and Rs. 451/-by way of mahr. The divorced lady challenges that order in R.P. 90/88 while the former husband has preferred C





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top