1. Appellant is the plaintiff in O.S. 79 of 1972 of the Munsiff Court, Alathur, who has lest his case in the trial Court as well as in the lower appellate court. Plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of possession on the strength of his title on the allegation that the defendants committed trespass into the plaint schedule property in March 1969. It is the case of the plaintiff that the property was demised on kanam to Narayana Iyer, that the kanari mortgaged it in favour of Subramania Iyer and another, that the plaintiff took assignment of the kanari's right as per Ext. Al and redeemed the property in O.S. 54 of 1943 and that he is entitled to recover the property from the unauthorised possession of the defendants. It is the admitted case that the plaintiff bad filed O.S. 115 of 1969 before the Munsiff Court, Alathur and that it was dismissed by this Court. The main contention of the plaintiff is that even if it is found that the suit property is not covered by Ext. A-1 still there is ample evidence with regard to his possession of the property as evidenced by the grant of patta, revenue receipts, land acquisition notices and the commission report. Counsel for the plai