SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 243

U.L.BHAT
LALITHA – Appellant
Versus
SARANGADHARAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The de facto complainant in a warrant case initiated by the police being aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal has filed this revision petition.

2. Originally there were two accused. Second accused died when the case was pending in the trial court. According to the prosecution first accused refused to advance loan of Rs. 500/- sought for by P. W.1 through exhibit A2 letter dated 9-3-1982 and hence first accused entertained ill-will against her. Oh 6-1-1983 at 10 a. m. the two accused jumped over the locked gate of the compound of P. W.1 and her father P. W. 2 and when hearing the noise P. W.1 opened the front door they trespassed into the front room. Second accused slapped her on the face and she fell down. First accused with an iron rod hit her four times and snatched away the gold chain from her neck. P. W. 2, who was at that time standing in the southern courtyard of the house heard the commotion and rushed to the scene. P. W. 3, maid servant, who was in the Kitchen also rushed to the scene. First accused with an iron rod hit P. W. 2 on the back and second accused slapped P. W. 3 on the left cheek and kicked her on the abdomen. P. W. 2 went inside, took an iron ro


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top