MALIMATH, SUKUMARAN, BHASKARAN NAMBIAR
ABDUL RAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER – Respondent
1. Two confessed defaulters seek redress under Art.226 of the Constitution in practically identical circumstances in these two writ petitions. For convenience, therefore, it is sufficient to refer to the petitioner and the facts in one writ petition, O. P. No. 3799 of 1981.
2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Palghat, notified on 4th December, 1979 that the right of collection and removal of all timber and firewood except Teak, Rosewood and other enumerated categories of wood, in specified areas will be offered for sale in public auction subject to certain conditions. The auction was held on 26-12-1979 and the petitioner was permitted to bid after he made the earnest money deposit of Rs. 1,000/- and signed a copy of the sale notice in token of having accepted all the conditions. He was the highest bidder with a bid of Rs. 3,31,000/-. He also paid on the sale date Rs. 10,000/- less the earnest money deposit already paid. Within a week thereafter, on 8-1-1980. he, however, informed the first respondent, the Divisional Forest Officer, through a lawyer notice that he was withdrawing his offer, and requesting for refund of the amount paid by him. The first respondent declined h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.